16Jun

We often get questions at our firm about how to defend a domestic violence charge when it is a he-said versus a she-said case and the wife/spouse does not want to testify.   I have had several of these of the years and routinely get them thrown out notwithstanding the prosecutor threatening to sanction my client’s wife for not wanting to testify against her husband.  A good example is a case that was recently dismissed by the court.  The prosecutor threatened to subpoena my wife to testify knowing she did not want to pursue the matter.  A subpoena is a written and legally binding command from the court to compel a witness to testify or submit to some command such as bring documents for examination.

My client’s wife did not want to testify against her husband and was not aware of her constitutional right to not be compelled to testify against her husband.  The prosecutor tried to persuade me that the spousal communication privilege applied (the right given to a husband and wife to refuse to testify in a trial as to confidential statements made to each other during their time as a married couple) did not apply in cases where one spouse committed and assault against the other spouse and, therefore, the victim spouse could be compelled to testify.  He was partially right.  However, the prosecutor confused the communication privilege with the spousal testimonial privilege.   The testimonial privilege is the right of a spouse to not be compelled to testify against her spouse, whereas the communication privilege is the right of one spouse to prevent the other spouse from testifying about any communication that was expressed during the marriage.  The prosecutor misunderstood the difference between the two.  Had an inexperienced attorney represented this particular husband and believed the prosecutor, the case would have likely been pled out and the defendant would have had a permanent blemish on his record and would have been denied the right to carry a firearm, and many other negative consequences.  Instead, this case was ultimately dismissed.

In other cases prosecutors, realizing that there actually is a difference between the spousal communication privilege and the testimonial privilege, have nonetheless still attempted to threaten the spouse into testifying by sending a subpoena and threatening sanctions for non-compliance.  Their objective is to scare the spouse into testifying, hoping she is unaware of her legal rights under Article I, section 12 of the Utah Constitution.   However, to counter the prosecutor’s argument, I have successfully convinced courts to bar the prosecutor from subpoenaing her to testify, even just to invoke her right to not testify in front of a jury.  My argument was that my client could be unfairly disadvantaged if the jury saw my client’s wife take the stand just to invoke the spousal testimonial privilege because the jury could infer she was trying to hide something or cover up a wrong her husband did out of fear of retaliation for what he may do to her if she testified against him.  The judge was persuaded by my motion and barred the prosecutor from issuing the subpoena to my client’s wife when she had made it clear that she wanted to invoke her spousal testimonial privilege (immunity from testifying against her husband).  This case, too, was ultimately dismissed.

If you or a loved one has found yourself in a difficult situation involving domestic violence or similar to the example given above don’t hesitate to contact me.  I am an experienced Utah domestic violence attorney and can be reached at 801-532-1717.  I will help you find out what your options are.  It’s vital that you understand what your legal rights are and how they can work to your benefit.

Druyon Law Offices does not currently represent any of the parties referenced in the article at the time it was written.  We have cited and linked all the sources of our information.  If you were or are involved in a similar situation and have questions about your rights and possible remedies, then call us. Do not act based on the above information without getting a consultation from a qualified attorney.  The information and opinions expressed above are from actual cases but should not be used in your particular case since every case is fact-sensitive and should be analyzed by a qualified attorney.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

25 Responses to “Utah Domestic Violence Attorney Speaks on Domestic Violence in real life!”

  1. Nice! It’s a rare find for a nice web site like this. I enjoyed it. Kudos to you. Have a very nice day!

  2. Charis says:

    I have got to hand it to you, you did a good job. The info is very appreciated.

  3. I would like to say “wow” what a inspiring post. This is really great. Keep doing what you’re doing!!

  4. backlinks says:

    I just wanted to comment and say that I really enjoyed reading your blog post here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I’ll be back to read more in the future

  5. Awesome blog! It drives me loony seeing folk trying to get legal help on Yahoo Anwers and Craigslist. People need to wake up and call a actual lawyer! anyhow, thanks once more for the great imformative blog post! Free Legal Help

  6. seo services says:

    I just wanted to comment and say that I really enjoyed reading your blog post here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I’ll be back to read more in the future

  7. bikini top says:

    I dont think I could have said it any better with my own words. You totally expressed the same thoughts that I was thinking with this wonderful blog writing. Please keep readers such as myself engaged and keep producing such great content.

  8. sheer thong says:

    Im going to tell you now, I believe im adding you to my favorite writers list. This is such a nice post and really hit the nail on the head for me. Please continue. Your readers need you.

  9. Jeff Olive says:

    Interesting read, perhaps the best article iv’e browse today. We learn everyday cheers to you!

  10. I agree with you and yes it certainly seeing guide lots of people.

  11. Why didnt I think about this? I hear exactly what youre saying and Im so happy that I came across your blog. You really know what youre talking about, and you made me feel like I should learn more about this. Thanks for this; Im officially a huge fan of your blog.

  12. Quincy Henri says:

    Good content. I constantly locate extremely outstanding articles here in your webpage.

  13. lawyer says:

    All right, It is very good

  14. I will add this blog to my favorites, it is great.

  15. Excelent post thank you for sharing such wonderful information!

  16. Thanks for contributing so much with this fantastic content.

  17. I just wanted to comment your blog and say that I really enjoyed reading your blog post here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I’ll be back to read more in the future…

  18. Julio Galpin says:

    Thanks a lot! I truly believe that a couple of my friends will appreciate this post.. now where is that email to your friends button again?

  19. Completely understand what your stance in this matter. Although I would disagree on some of the finer details, I think you did an awesome job explaining it. Sure beats having to research it on my own. Thanks

  20. actually a genuinely well thought out post. I certainly enjoyed reading it. Thanks

  21. Awesome post! You have a wonderful blog, absolutely the finest Ive read so far. I will be looking forward to your next entry. Thanks again.

  22. Abe Points says:

    Thank you for a fantastic post. I enjoyed it.

  23. Thank you for this info! I enjoyed it.

  24. Tandblekning says:

    This is my first time visiting your blog. I do envy you since you seem to get a lot more comments then I do. Do you have any secret tips on how I can get more comments or do I just have to be paitent? Anyway, keep up the good work.

  25. Bookmarking now thanks, do you have a RSS feed ?

Leave a Reply